Monthly Archives: August 2013

International Centre for Counter-Terrorism on Commander Breivik

The ICCT (International Centre for Counter-Terrorism) recently published a research paper titled: The Anders Behring Breivik Trial: Performing Justice, Defending Democracy. Read it here:

Click to access ICCT-De-Graaf-et-al-The-Anders-Behring-Breivik-Trial-August-2013.pdf

In their introduction they state the trial upheld the democratic values of Norwegian society – in stark contrast to Breivik’s values. The tone is set with this statement, it should be self-evident that nowadays all it takes for a nation to be democratic is for it to proclaim that, it is in fact, democratic. Iran uses this strategy with great success.

In the first paragraph these 4 researchers get their facts wrong by claiming Breivik’s defense pursued an insanity plea. Breivik never instructed his lawyers to pursue an insanity plea.

The paper further indicates that the researchers argue from the position that Cultural Marxism is right and Breivik is wrong. From this point of view any form of terrorism is by definition immoral, and subsequently the function of a televised trial is to prevent further terrorism, and a means to soothe the masses. There is no mention of the widespread claim that political correctness sky-rocketed in Norway after 7/22.

It’s interesting to note that the concept of democracy has become increasingly totalitarian. Possibly because in its current form democracies are the ultimate political equivalent of communism. Each individual has one vote regardless of their individual worth, like under communism (in political theory) each individual earns the same wage regardless of their individual worth. Under communism the strong must be subdued by the weak, which is only possible by grouping and mobilizing the weak as a numerical majority. Intellectuals who pursue power and support the doctrine are welcomed with open arms, intellectuals who oppose the doctrine are vilified.

This applies to these researchers as well, if they would classify Breivik’s actions as morally right their careers would be finished. Subsequently they held many polls, yet failed to ask the most important question a terrorism researcher should ask: Do you support Breivik?

Where the current system differs from Stalinism is that we experience totalitarianism with a velvet glove, meaning that minimal totalitarian force is applied, which creates the illusion that freedom prevails. In reality you will be locked up and silenced if you successfully express unpopular thought, though most people use self-censorship to prevent this from happening. There’s no need to kill people if a fine or a visit from the anti-fa is enough to shut them up. What sets Breivik apart is that he did so much damage that the threat of prolonged incarceration no longer affects him.

In such a system it’s important that sentences are never final, so there is always the glimmer of hope. This typically forces a political prisoner to reject their ideology and embrace Cultural Marxism, and beg to be released. As was to be expected Breivik refused to engage in self-censorship and continued to propagandize himself as a hero in his letters, so his freedom of speech was taken away from him. This leaves prolonged isolation and other forms of torture as the only means for the system to force Breivik into compliance.

The researchers claim that the trial creates a unique opportunity to bring several parties together: terrorists, state representatives, the judiciary, the audience, surviving victims, terrorist sympathizers, etc. However, they fail to mention that sympathizers were barred from the courts, nor do they mention that Breivik and many of his witnesses were not televised whenever they took the stand. All that the people watching from their TVs saw was Breivik making his “far-right” salute, sobbing witnesses, psychiatrists explaining how Breivik is sick in the head, and ‘experts’ who make a living by stringing politically correct half-truths together.

An important keyword that is used is that the population at large must ‘cope’. People have to ‘cope’ with terrorism, ‘cope’ with multiculturalism, and people have to continue to participate in the meaningless materialistic consumption society that has been created for them. The highest achievable goal has become to keep the Multicultural Experiment running, that things must remain orderly, pleasant, and polite as we march on towards our collective suicide. Orders are Orders. This is a strong sentiment during the trial, expressed in the statement that ‘Breivik cannot be allowed to change our values’. Values believed to be eternal and absolute, but which in reality were introduced between 1945 and 1968.

The researchers summarize the prosecution strategy as discrediting 2083, discrediting Breivik’s person, and glorifying the victims.

The researchers held another survey and of those questioned 24% believed Breivik to be insane, 16% agreed with the prosecutor’s strategy, and 13% believed Breivik to be unaccountable.

The researchers once again claim that Breivik instructed his lawyers to work towards an insanity plea, but they do not back this up with any sources. It’s unclear why they want to perpetuate this lie, and go as far as inserting a source that is completely unrelated to their claims.

The researchers mention that Breivik wanted to use the trial as a platform to propagandize his ideology. They recognize that Breivik seeks to delegitimize the system. They also fully quote Breivik’s final words in court.

The researchers mention the 40,000 people who sang the rainbow song, but fail to mention how entire classrooms were emptied out for this ‘demonstration’. This was of course not a demonstration, but a display of political correctness and political power that proves Breivik’s point that we do not live in a democracy, but in a totalitarian world where your rights end where the emotions of a Cultural Marxist begin.

The researchers mention the ‘Russian Breivik’ who was completely unrelated to Breivik, but do mention the Polish and Czech militant nationalists who were arrested. They are also incorrect in their low estimate of the influence of Breivik in White Nationalist circles, in their defense it’s difficult to take notice of the self-censorship that takes place unless you’re right in the middle of it and observe when messages in support of Breivik get erased, and supporters get banned. Not that Stormfront matters: Breivik is the future; the line in the sand has been drawn that separates the adults from the children.

The researchers polled people as to their satisfaction with the trial, and the obvious conclusion is that Breivik won. This because the goals of the Cultural Marxists for the trial (revenge, prevention, symbolism, truth, stability, democracy, and closure) were not satisfactorily met, while Breivik’s goal (presenting both perspectives) was.

The researchers tried to determine the trauma caused by 7/22, and noted that particularly women, immigrants, and the elderly are frightened.

The researchers conclude that overall the trial was a slight victory for Cultural Marxism, but they don’t seem very convinced of their own right, as if they’re aware they’re trying to put a positive spin on it to secure future funding for research projects. They disregard their scientific objectivity when they assert the official Cultural Marxist answer to 7/22: Democracy won and Breivik lost.

We’ll see about that.

Breivik International: Letters and Lithuanian translation

Breivik’s April 17 opening statement is now available in Lithuanian.

On the English Breivik Archive we’ve added some Norwegian Court Documents relating to the July 25 hearing, fairly boring stuff, they’re linked from the transcripts section.

As no new letters have become available we’ve transcribed a Norwegian letter dated 2012-07-02 to Daisy that is slightly more detailed than the letter to Lisa. We’ve also transcribed the first two pages of the 38-page letter in which Breivik criticizes the first psychiatric report. Next we’ve collected a series of quotes from the 27-page letter Breivik wrote to the Norwegian Correctional Services containing suggestions for improving his conditions.

On the Norwegian Breivik Archive we’ve added translations of Breivik’s Diary and Breivik’s Interview that were included in 2083.

The original Norwegian versions of the new letters available in the English letter section are available on the Norwegian Archive as well.


False Flag by Swedish Antifa

I don’t like using the term False Flag, as it’s been used by too many idiots, but let’s call a spade a spade.

Some Antifascist who got an F in English is somehow expecting to get an A+ in chemistry after writing a letter containing a bomb threat to a Swedish Conservative newspaper.

In English so abysmal it can only be intentional (to portray Nationalists as being of low intelligence) he makes threats against the Swedish royal family and homosexuals. If this guy is an actual Nationalist he does not represent Commander Breivik.

First of all, no sane Militant Nationalist would attack the royals because they have no real power. Breivik himself said he considered bombing the Royal palace if he had three car bombs (see chapter 3.41 of 2083), but only if he could guarantee that the royal family itself would not get hurt. Also, if anyone should be trialed for high treason and executed after Cultural Marxism is brought to its knees it should be the European Royal Heads of State. Breivik made it very clear that unless the European royals resolutely reject Cultural Marxism (and resign), they will go down with the sinking ship.

Secondly, homosexuals have nothing to fear from Crusader Nationalists. Our Russian brothers are making a huge mistake by advocating violence against homosexuals. They should oppose all forms of Marxism, and Marxism at its core is Cultural Determinism. Homosexuality is a mental and genetic disorder, but you can no more forbid homosexuality than you can forbid depression, schizophrenia, autism, or left-handedness.

There was a time when Cultural Determinists wanted to eradicate left-handedness, they tried, they failed, nobody was better for it. There is a small genetic component to handedness, but once the brain has settled on a preference it is extremely hard to sway it.

Do parents feel a deep pain in their heart when their son or daughter turns out to be a homosexual? Of course they do, and to promote anything that would increase the odds of a child becoming homosexual is just as wrong as to promote anything that would increase the odds of a teenager becoming anorexic.

Those that fall victim to disease deserve our compassion. Any Nationalist ought to realize that excluding all left-handed people would hurt our cause, the same goes for homosexuals under the condition that they don’t take pride in their disorder.

This does not mean I want to silence homosexuals. I don’t believe I can silence a true White man because I would expect him to try to kill me for doing so. If a homosexual feels deep inside his soul that his sexual preference is his nature and that he will not change who he is, that is his cross to bear, and he will have my understanding. Let’s get back to the issue at hand. Those who speak the truth about homosexuality are silenced in Western Europe, and it’s possible that intellectual positions like mine are silenced in Eastern Europe as well. This would be a win-win for Cultural Marxism.

Fortunately you cannot enslave a free man, the best you can do is lock him up and forbid all communication to the outside world.

Update 2013-08-22

Today it also became known that Breivik has continued to see a psychologist in prison. This is a smart move on his part because he needs the socialization because solitary confinement is extremely damaging to the human psyche. He would be a fool to reject one hour a week of human company.

We’re Radioactive

Like a true child of my generation I’m an expert at deconstruction, to spin something around like a puzzle piece, bend it, mold it, until it fits whatever world view I want it to fit.

A catchy song with revolutionary and militant undertones managed to catch my attention, and I realized it had been a while since a Commander Breivik video had surfaced on YouTube.

It speaks of pollution, which is obviously a metaphor for propaganda, which pollutes the mind. It speaks of an impending apocalypse and being on a prison bus, which means that we’re held captive by political correctness, and on this metaphorical prison bus headed towards our cultural suicide, incapable to put it to a stop. The lyrics speaks of waking up, an almost universal phrase and concept among Ethnic Nationalists, and the euphoric feeling of being awake comes with the awareness that you can no longer speak your mind, that your thoughts have become impure, evil, hateful, in other words, that you have become radioactive. It says that with the color red you will fit right in, a reference to the red cross of the Templar Knights and the red rose of the Cultural Marxists. It states the sun hasn’t died yet, communicating the hope and excitement many of us felt early 2012, the same time this song was written.

Of course this is a load of bull, the song could be about anything, but as nobody dares speaking their mind the system has created a situation where Ethnic Nationalists have to speak in metaphor, subsequently everyone is suspect when they create militant rock that doesn’t clearly embrace diversity and White Genocide, and subsequently I’ll gladly hijack any song that fails to do so. It’s unclear if the popularity of the song indicates that it taps into a subconscious realization that our downfall is near.

I’ve also uploaded the video to VK, as it probably won’t last long on YouTube.

Radioactivity – Imagine Dragons

They know their ability to censor is so vast that our message is like the tree that falls in a forest with no one around to hear it; that it makes no sound. So we shall fight in silence until there is no forest left.

Update 2013-08-20

The video has been blocked in some European nations. What is interesting here is that YouTube is extremely vague about what law the video is breaking in the nations. It has to be some kind of hate speech law, but it’s unclear which one.

Regarding your account: Angus Thermopylae

We have received a legal complaint regarding your video. After review, the following video: Radioactive – The European Underground has been blocked from view on the following YouTube country site(s):

French Southern Territories, France, Italy, Switzerland, Saint Pierre and Miquelon, Poland, Wallis and Futuna, New Caledonia, Austria, French Polynesia, Guadeloupe, Reunion, French Guiana, Germany, Mayotte, Czech Republic, Israel, Martinique

YouTube blocks content where necessary to comply with local laws. Please review our help center article on legal complaints //

The YouTube Team

Breivik International: Spanish translation

A Spanish translation of Commander Breivik’s opening statement is now available on Breivik International. This brings the total number of languages the document is available in at 13.

Anders Behring Breivik Proceso – Declaración ante la Corte 2012-04-17


We all know what Breivik did for us, what can you do for Breivik?

The map above shows which translations are still missing. If you speak one of the missing languages and want to help out it’s best to use one of the existing translations from Breivik International. You can use Google translate to do a rough machine translation to get you started. When finished you can email the translation to

The Breivik Diaries

In his letter to Morgenbladet last June Commander Breivik wrote that he would submit his first book, The Breivik Diaries, to his publisher on August 1. Obviously this book will need to pass censorship, and as there is no limit on how long a letter, article, or book may remain in review this may take a year, a decade, or until the Cultural Marxist ideology is wiped from the face of Europe.

There is also a good chance the prison authorities will deem the book a disturbance of the peace, and subsequently prevent it from being published. Breivik is engaged in a legal battle over his constitutional right to free speech, but as of yet no information is available.

As Breivik wrote me in his February of 2012 letter he was planning to start a 3 year Bachelor course in Political Science in January of 2013, next continue with a master’s in Political Science. Breivik subsequently applied to the University of Oslo, was rejected, requested an explanation of his rejection, and was given an explanation in a letter that was intercepted and given to the media on August 1.

As Breivik didn’t bother to finish his high school education the University of Oslo rejected his application on the grounds that he didn’t properly document that he has sufficient skill in English, Social Studies, Mathematics, and Natural Science.

Anyone who has read Breivik’s letters knows that he speaks English fluently, in stark contrast with the emails in mangled English I occasionally get from Norwegian journalists, who supposedly did finish their high school education.

Chemistry is considered one of the Natural Sciences, and 2083 more than qualifies Breivik as an A+ student in chemistry, as evidenced by his manufacture of complex improvised explosives. Breivik also shows a familiarity with the physics behind explosions, and an understanding of nuclear physics in his research regarding capturing a nuclear power plant and creating a nuclear meltdown.

Regarding Breivik’s qualifications when it comes to the Social Sciences; he filled up at least 500 pages in 2083 about the history of Cultural Marxism and displays a knowledge and familiarity with political topics that far exceed that which is expected of a high school graduate.

This leaves the subject of Mathematics. Once again 2083 shows that Breivik has a familiarity with the field of Statistics that surpasses high school requirements. I’ve seen Breivik use Algebra in 2083 which showed proficiency. Geometry is straight forward and not really a requirement for the study of Political Science, unless you want to calculate the maximum number of traitors that can be fit on Utoya, and the most efficient route to traverse in order to execute them. Breivik’s activities on the stock market, running a company with 7 employees, utilization of various tax havens to avoid taxes on half a million Euros of profit, among other things, indicate that he more than qualifies when it comes to generic mathematical capabilities.

I would say that anyone with similar qualifications would have been accepted, but political correctness dictates that the university had to reject Breivik’s application on any possible ground.

I assume this means that Breivik has to finish his high school education first, which would take him about a year as he’ll need high passing grades in order to guarantee qualification. Quite possibly Breivik has already started this process in the understanding that his university application would be denied.

I personally don’t see the point in studying Political Science, but the actual study may give Breivik access to useful resources like a computer and a wide variety of documents. In addition he would have to write a thesis which would provide an opportunity to circumvent censorship. This alone would be reason for Cultural Marxists to pressure the University of Oslo into rejecting Breivik’s application.

Education minister Kristin Halvorsen has said she will look at loopholes in the law to deny Breivik the right to study, and will change the law if possible.

In response Breivik’s lawyer Geir Lippestad stated: “I believe it is bordering torture to give Breivik no meaning in his life when he is spending the next 20 to 30 years in prison. We must treat people decently even if they’ve done terrible things. If not we may as well start talking about the death penalty.”

August 5th Breivik was informed by his lawyer Vibeke Hein Bæra that he would soon be temporarily relocated to Skien prison. Breivik told Bæra he was relieved and happy to return to Skien, where he spend the months of August and September in the year 2012 while the isolation cells in Ila were being renovated. It’s probably best to keep sending letters to Ila where Breivik will eventually return.

Update 2013-08-09

AUF member Torvik Langerod stated to a news paper:

Oslo University is a place where one learns that one should pursue one’s opinions with words. You cannot tape over the mouths of those you disagree with, or shoot them.

What these traitors continue to fail to realize is that Commander Breivik did what he did because they are taping over the mouths of those they disagree with. Deprived of their freedom of speech the European peoples are led like sheep, ignorant and scared and silenced, to the slaughter. There is no greater act of heroism than to put your own life on the line to resist your people’s genocide.

What this man-child should have learned while studying Political Science is that you cannot tape over the mouths of those you disagree with without expecting to be shot. If you make peaceful revolution impossible you make violent revolution inevitable.